# rational number: be used in cooking

from Quasimodo

## Related concepts

 Parents numberWeight: 0.73, real numberWeight: 0.63, problemWeight: 0.62, objectWeight: 0.55 Siblings irrational numberWeight: 0.82, integerWeight: 0.60, complex numberWeight: 0.38, imaginary numberWeight: 0.38, social security numberWeight: 0.37

## Related properties

 Similarity Property be used in cooking 1.00

## Clauses

### Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(number, be used in cooking)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(rational number, be used in cooking)

### Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rational number, be used in cooking)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(number, be used in cooking)

### Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rational number, be used in cooking)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(number, be used in cooking)

### Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rational number, be used in cooking)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(integer, be used in cooking)

### Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(number, be used in cooking)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(rational number, be used in cooking)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rational number, be used in cooking)

### Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rational number, be used in cooking)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(integer, be used in cooking)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(integer, be used in cooking)

### Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rational number, be used in cooking)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(rational number, be used in cooking)

### Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(rational number, be used in cooking)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(rational number, be used in cooking)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rational number, be used in cooking)

### Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rational number, be used in cooking)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(rational number, be used in cooking)

### Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rational number, be used in cooking)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(number, be used in cooking)

### Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rational number, be used in cooking)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(integer, be used in cooking)

### Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(rational number, be used in cooking)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(number, be used in cooking)