rattlesnake: be adapted to desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snake
Weight: 0.74
, animal
Weight: 0.69
, wildlife
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.65
, reptile
Weight: 0.58
Siblings copperhead
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.38
, boa constrictor
Weight: 0.37
, alligator
Weight: 0.37
, python
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be adapted to desert 1.00
be adapted to sahara desert 0.96
adapt to desert 0.93
survive in desert 0.85
live in desert 0.85
survive heat of desert 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(snake, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(snake, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(reptile, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(reptile, live in desert)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(snake, survive in desert)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(snake, live in desert)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(reptile, live in desert)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(snake, survive in desert)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(snake, live in desert)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(coyote, survive in desert)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(python, live in desert)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(coyote, live in desert)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(coyote, live in desert)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(coyote, adapt to desert)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(boa constrictor, live in desert)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(snake, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(snake, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(reptile, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(coyote, adapt to desert)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(coyote, adapt to desert)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(python, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(python, live in desert)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(coyote, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(coyote, survive in desert)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(coyote, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(coyote, live in desert)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(coyote, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(coyote, live in desert)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(boa constrictor, live in desert)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(boa constrictor, live in desert)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(rattlesnake, be adapted to sahara desert)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rattlesnake, be adapted to sahara desert)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to sahara desert)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to sahara desert)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(rattlesnake, adapt to desert)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(rattlesnake, adapt to desert)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(rattlesnake, survive in desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(rattlesnake, adapt to desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(rattlesnake, live in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(rattlesnake, survive in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(rattlesnake, survive in desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(rattlesnake, survive heat of desert)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, survive in desert)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(rattlesnake, live in desert)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(rattlesnake, live in desert)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(rattlesnake, survive heat of desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(rattlesnake, survive heat of desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, live in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, survive heat of desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, adapt to desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(reptile, live in desert)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(snake, live in desert)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(snake, survive in desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(python, live in desert)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(coyote, survive in desert)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coyote, live in desert)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coyote, live in desert)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(coyote, adapt to desert)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(boa constrictor, live in desert)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(reptile, live in desert)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(snake, survive in desert)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rattlesnake, be adapted to desert)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(snake, live in desert)