raw material: affect location of industry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.76
, produce
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.63
, ingredient
Weight: 0.62
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.73
, iron ore
Weight: 0.71
, lumber
Weight: 0.70
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.69
, rubber
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect location of industry 1.00
affect location 0.90
be used in industry 0.85
be important in business 0.76
affect environment 0.76
is locations 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(material, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(raw material, affect location of industry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(material, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(material, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, be used in industry)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, is locations)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(material, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(raw material, affect location of industry)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(iron ore, be used in industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(iron ore, be used in industry)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(iron ore, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(iron ore, affect environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(iron ore, is locations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(iron ore, is locations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(raw material, affect location of industry)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(raw material, affect location)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(raw material, affect location)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(raw material, affect location)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(raw material, affect location)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(raw material, affect location of industry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(raw material, affect location of industry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(material, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(iron ore, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(iron ore, be used in industry)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(iron ore, is locations)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(material, be important in business)