raw: be slimy chicken

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents show
Weight: 0.62
, tv show
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, format
Weight: 0.48
, function
Weight: 0.47
Siblings fresh air
Weight: 0.33
, talk show
Weight: 0.32
, game show
Weight: 0.32
, mash
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be slimy chicken 1.00
be brown beef 0.77
is meat red 0.76
is broccoli spicy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(raw, be slimy chicken)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(raw, be slimy chicken)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(raw, be slimy chicken)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raw, is broccoli spicy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(raw, be slimy chicken)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(raw, is broccoli spicy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(raw, be slimy chicken)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(raw, is broccoli spicy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(raw, be slimy chicken)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(raw, is meat red)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(raw, be slimy chicken)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(raw, is meat red)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(raw, be slimy chicken)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(raw, is meat red)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(raw, be slimy chicken)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(raw, is broccoli spicy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(raw, be slimy chicken)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(raw, be brown beef)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(raw, be slimy chicken)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(raw, be brown beef)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(raw, be slimy chicken)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(raw, is meat red)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(raw, be slimy chicken)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(raw, be brown beef)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(raw, be slimy chicken)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(raw, be brown beef)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(raw, be slimy chicken)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(raw, be slimy chicken)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(raw, be slimy chicken)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(raw, be slimy chicken)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(raw, be slimy chicken)