ray: be more dangerous on high mountains

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents friend
Weight: 0.60
, film
Weight: 0.59
, character
Weight: 0.58
, movie
Weight: 0.57
Siblings gamma ray
Weight: 0.80
, manta ray
Weight: 0.77
, sawfish
Weight: 0.32
, terminator
Weight: 0.31
, superman
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more dangerous on high mountains 1.00
is dangerous 0.81
be high time 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(manta ray, is dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sawfish, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(gamma ray, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, is dangerous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sawfish, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sawfish, is dangerous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(manta ray, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(manta ray, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(ray, is dangerous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ray, be high time)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ray, is dangerous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(ray, is dangerous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ray, be high time)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ray, be high time)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ray, be high time)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ray, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(gamma ray, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sawfish, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ray, be more dangerous on high mountains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(manta ray, is dangerous)