rbc: is anucleate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blood cell
Weight: 0.49
, cell
Weight: 0.47
, financial institution
Weight: 0.47
, company
Weight: 0.43
, organization
Weight: 0.41
Siblings red blood cell
Weight: 0.28
, white blood cell
Weight: 0.27
, sperm cell
Weight: 0.27
, stem cell
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
is osmometers 1.00
is anucleate 1.00
is biconcave 1.00
is osmometer 1.00
is amitotic 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(blood cell, is biconcave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(rbc, is anucleate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(blood cell, is biconcave)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(blood cell, is biconcave)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, is biconcave)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(blood cell, is biconcave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(rbc, is anucleate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(red blood cell, is biconcave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(red blood cell, is biconcave)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(rbc, is anucleate)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(rbc, is biconcave)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(rbc, is biconcave)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is biconcave)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(rbc, is osmometer)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(rbc, is amitotic)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(rbc, is osmometer)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is osmometer)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(rbc, is osmometers)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(rbc, is osmometers)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(rbc, is osmometer)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(rbc, is biconcave)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(rbc, is osmometers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is osmometers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(rbc, is amitotic)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(rbc, is amitotic)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is amitotic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is anucleate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(rbc, is anucleate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(blood cell, is biconcave)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(red blood cell, is biconcave)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(rbc, is anucleate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(blood cell, is biconcave)