reaction: have activation energy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical reaction
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, concept
Weight: 0.56
, call
Weight: 0.56
Siblings shock
Weight: 0.66
, frustration
Weight: 0.66
, anger
Weight: 0.64
, oxidation
Weight: 0.63
, dissociation
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
have activation energy 1.00
require energy of activation 0.96
require activation energy 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(chemical reaction, require activation energy)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(reaction, have activation energy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chemical reaction, require energy of activation)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(reaction, have activation energy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(chemical reaction, require energy of activation)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(chemical reaction, require activation energy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, require activation energy)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, require energy of activation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(chemical reaction, require activation energy)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(reaction, have activation energy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chemical reaction, require energy of activation)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(reaction, have activation energy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(reaction, have activation energy)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(reaction, require energy of activation)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(reaction, require activation energy)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(reaction, require activation energy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(reaction, require activation energy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(reaction, require energy of activation)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(reaction, require energy of activation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(reaction, require energy of activation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(reaction, require activation energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(reaction, have activation energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(reaction, have activation energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, require energy of activation)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, require activation energy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, require energy of activation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(reaction, have activation energy)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, require activation energy)