read: causes gain knowledge

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.58
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings good book
Weight: 0.63
, book
Weight: 0.63
, sign language
Weight: 0.33
, write
Weight: 0.33
, english language
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
causes gain knowledge 1.00
be used to read to gain knowledge from 0.92
be used to gain knowledge or entertainment 0.90
causes knowledge 0.90
causes increase knowledge 0.88
be used to get knowledge 0.88
be used to storaging knowledge 0.87
be used to knowledge 0.87
requires knowledge 0.87
be used to hold knowledge 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(read, causes gain knowledge)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(book, be used to storaging knowledge)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(read, causes gain knowledge)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(book, be used to hold knowledge)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(read, causes gain knowledge)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(book, be used to hold knowledge)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(book, be used to hold knowledge)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(read, causes gain knowledge)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(book, be used to storaging knowledge)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(book, be used to storaging knowledge)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(read, causes gain knowledge)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(read, causes gain knowledge)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(read, causes gain knowledge)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(read, causes knowledge)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(read, causes gain knowledge)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(read, causes knowledge)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(read, causes gain knowledge)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(read, causes knowledge)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(read, causes gain knowledge)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(read, causes knowledge)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(read, causes gain knowledge)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(read, causes gain knowledge)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(read, causes gain knowledge)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(read, causes gain knowledge)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(read, causes gain knowledge)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(read, causes gain knowledge)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(book, be used to storaging knowledge)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(read, causes gain knowledge)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(book, be used to hold knowledge)