read: page through book

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.58
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings good book
Weight: 0.63
, book
Weight: 0.63
, sign language
Weight: 0.33
, write
Weight: 0.33
, english language
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
page through book 1.00
has page 0.89
be make up of page of paper 0.89
has page in them 0.89
has paper page 0.89
be make up of page 0.89
has paper page in them 0.89
be made of paper page 0.87
has page with write on them 0.87
has many page 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(read, page through book)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(book, has page)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(read, page through book)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(book, has many page)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(read, page through book)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(book, be make up of page)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(read, page through book)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(book, has paper page)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(read, page through book)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(book, has paper page)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(book, has paper page)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(read, page through book)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(book, be make up of page)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(book, be make up of page)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(read, page through book)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(book, has page)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(book, has page)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(read, page through book)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(book, has many page)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(book, has many page)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(read, page through book)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(read, page through book)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(read, page through book)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(read, page through book)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(read, page through book)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(read, page through book)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(read, page through book)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(read, page through book)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(book, has paper page)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(read, page through book)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(book, be make up of page)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(read, page through book)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(book, has page)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(read, page through book)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(book, has many page)