reader: distinguish between use of devices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, woman
Weight: 0.59
, journal
Weight: 0.59
Siblings editor
Weight: 0.65
, news article
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.33
, phone book
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
distinguish between use of devices 1.00
distinguish between use of retorical devices 1.00
distinguish between use 0.94
distinguish between prejudicial use of retorical devices 0.87
distinguish between prejudicial use of devices 0.87
distinguish between prejudicial use 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(reader, distinguish between use of devices)

Similarity expansion

0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(reader, distinguish between use of retorical devices)
0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(reader, distinguish between use of retorical devices)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(reader, distinguish between use)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(reader, distinguish between use)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(reader, distinguish between use of retorical devices)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(reader, distinguish between prejudicial use of devices)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(reader, distinguish between prejudicial use of retorical devices)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(reader, distinguish between prejudicial use)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(reader, distinguish between use)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(reader, distinguish between prejudicial use of devices)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(reader, distinguish between prejudicial use of retorical devices)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(reader, distinguish between use of retorical devices)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(reader, distinguish between use)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(reader, distinguish between prejudicial use)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(reader, distinguish between prejudicial use of devices)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(reader, distinguish between prejudicial use of retorical devices)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(reader, distinguish between prejudicial use)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(reader, distinguish between prejudicial use of devices)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(reader, distinguish between prejudicial use of retorical devices)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(reader, distinguish between prejudicial use)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(reader, distinguish between use of devices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(reader, distinguish between use of devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(reader, distinguish between use of devices)