real estate agent: drive cars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate
Weight: 0.73
, client
Weight: 0.67
, business people
Weight: 0.67
, individual
Weight: 0.64
Siblings appraiser
Weight: 0.60
, condo
Weight: 0.35
, townhouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
drive cars 1.00
drive expensive cars 0.96
drive nice cars 0.91
have cars 0.90
have nice cars 0.81
drive economy 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(real estate, drive economy)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(real estate agent, drive cars)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(real estate, drive economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(real estate, drive economy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(real estate, drive economy)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, drive cars)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(real estate agent, drive cars)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, drive expensive cars)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(real estate agent, drive expensive cars)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, drive expensive cars)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(real estate agent, drive expensive cars)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, drive nice cars)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(real estate agent, have cars)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(real estate agent, drive nice cars)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(real estate agent, drive nice cars)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, drive nice cars)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, have cars)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, have nice cars)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, have cars)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(real estate agent, have cars)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(real estate agent, have nice cars)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, have nice cars)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(real estate agent, have nice cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, drive cars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(real estate agent, drive cars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(real estate, drive economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(real estate agent, drive cars)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(real estate, drive economy)