real estate agent: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate
Weight: 0.73
, client
Weight: 0.67
, business people
Weight: 0.67
, individual
Weight: 0.64
Siblings appraiser
Weight: 0.60
, condo
Weight: 0.35
, townhouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
is paid 0.96
get waivor 0.79
pay taxes 0.77
pay tax 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(individual, pay taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate agent, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(real estate agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(individual, pay taxes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(individual, pay taxes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(individual, pay taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(real estate agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(real estate agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(real estate agent, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(real estate agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(real estate agent, is paid)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(real estate agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(real estate agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is paid)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(real estate agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(real estate agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(real estate agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate agent, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(individual, pay taxes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(real estate agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(individual, pay taxes)