real estate agent: have pictures on business cards

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate
Weight: 0.73
, client
Weight: 0.67
, business people
Weight: 0.67
, individual
Weight: 0.64
Siblings appraiser
Weight: 0.60
, condo
Weight: 0.35
, townhouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have pictures on business cards 1.00
put on cards 0.84
take pictures 0.83
leave cards 0.82
take pictures of inside 0.82
take pictures of inside of house 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(appraiser, take pictures of inside of house)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(appraiser, take pictures of inside)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(appraiser, take pictures)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(appraiser, take pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(appraiser, take pictures)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(appraiser, take pictures of inside) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(appraiser, take pictures of inside)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(appraiser, take pictures of inside of house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(appraiser, take pictures of inside of house)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(real estate agent, put on cards)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(real estate agent, leave cards)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, leave cards)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, leave cards)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, put on cards)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, put on cards)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(real estate agent, leave cards)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(real estate agent, put on cards)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(appraiser, take pictures)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(appraiser, take pictures of inside)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(appraiser, take pictures of inside of house)