real estate agent: is independent contractors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate
Weight: 0.73
, client
Weight: 0.67
, business people
Weight: 0.67
, individual
Weight: 0.64
Siblings appraiser
Weight: 0.60
, condo
Weight: 0.35
, townhouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is independent contractors 1.00
has physical part contractors 0.90
hire consultants 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(client, hire consultants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is independent contractors)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(real estate agent, is independent contractors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(client, hire consultants)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is independent contractors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(client, hire consultants)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(client, hire consultants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(real estate agent, is independent contractors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is independent contractors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(real estate agent, is independent contractors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(real estate agent, is independent contractors)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(real estate agent, is independent contractors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(real estate agent, has physical part contractors)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(real estate agent, is independent contractors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(real estate agent, has physical part contractors)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(real estate agent, is independent contractors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, has physical part contractors)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(real estate agent, is independent contractors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, has physical part contractors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(real estate agent, is independent contractors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is independent contractors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is independent contractors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(real estate agent, is independent contractors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is independent contractors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is independent contractors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(client, hire consultants)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(real estate agent, is independent contractors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(client, hire consultants)