real estate: have word

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate agent
Weight: 0.89
, estate
Weight: 0.76
, course
Weight: 0.67
, enterprise
Weight: 0.67
Siblings parking lot
Weight: 0.67
, trust
Weight: 0.66
, appraisal
Weight: 0.65
, condo
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
have word 1.00
have word real 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(estate, have word real)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(real estate, have word)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(real estate, have word)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(estate, have word real)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(real estate, have word)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(estate, have word real)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(estate, have word real)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(real estate, have word)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(real estate, have word)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(real estate, have word)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(real estate, have word)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(real estate, have word)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(real estate, have word real)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(real estate, have word)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(real estate, have word real)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(real estate, have word)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(real estate, have word real)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(real estate, have word)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(real estate, have word real)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(real estate, have word)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(real estate, have word)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(real estate, have word)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(real estate, have word)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(real estate, have word)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(real estate, have word)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(estate, have word real)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(real estate, have word)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(estate, have word real)