realtor: have bad reputation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents professional
Weight: 0.64
, business people
Weight: 0.60
, website
Weight: 0.59
, site
Weight: 0.57
, customer
Weight: 0.56
Siblings appraiser
Weight: 0.34
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.34
, notary
Weight: 0.33
, banker
Weight: 0.33
, accountant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad reputation 1.00
have reputation 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(realtor, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, have bad reputation)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(realtor, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, have reputation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(realtor, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(real estate agent, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, have bad reputation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(realtor, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(real estate agent, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, have reputation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(realtor, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(realtor, have bad reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(realtor, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(realtor, have reputation)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(realtor, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(realtor, have reputation)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(realtor, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(realtor, have reputation)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(realtor, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(realtor, have reputation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(realtor, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(realtor, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(realtor, have bad reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(realtor, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(realtor, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(realtor, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(real estate agent, have reputation)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(realtor, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(real estate agent, have bad reputation)