rear window: have lines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents window
Weight: 0.83
, vehicle
Weight: 0.64
, movie
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.57
Siblings front door
Weight: 0.41
, window pane
Weight: 0.40
, windshield
Weight: 0.39
, door
Weight: 0.38
, wall
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have lines 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rear window, have lines)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(windshield, have lines)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rear window, have lines)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(windshield, have lines)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(windshield, have lines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rear window, have lines)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(rear window, have lines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rear window, have lines)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(rear window, have lines)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rear window, have lines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rear window, have lines)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(rear window, have lines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rear window, have lines)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(windshield, have lines)