receiver: get hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents radio receiver
Weight: 0.76
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, officer
Weight: 0.60
, position
Weight: 0.60
Siblings rusher
Weight: 0.40
, cornerback
Weight: 0.35
, quarterback
Weight: 0.34
, linebacker
Weight: 0.34
, aor
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get hot 1.00
get cancelled 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(electronic device, get hot)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(receiver, get hot)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(position, get cancelled)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(receiver, get hot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(receiver, get hot)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(electronic device, get hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(receiver, get hot)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(position, get cancelled)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(receiver, get hot)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, get hot)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(receiver, get hot)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(position, get cancelled)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(electronic device, get hot)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(receiver, get hot)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(receiver, get hot)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(position, get cancelled)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(receiver, get hot)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(receiver, get hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(receiver, get hot)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(receiver, get hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(receiver, get hot)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(receiver, get hot)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(receiver, get hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(receiver, get hot)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(receiver, get hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(receiver, get hot)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(electronic device, get hot)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(receiver, get hot)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(position, get cancelled)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(receiver, get hot)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(electronic device, get hot)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(receiver, get hot)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(position, get cancelled)