:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, job)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waitress, job)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, job)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waitress, jobs)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, job)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(waiter, job)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, job)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, jobs)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(receptionist, job)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(waiter, job)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(waiter, job)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, job)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(waitress, job)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, job)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(waiter, job)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, job)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(waitress, jobs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, job)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(waiter, jobs)