recession: be assessed in absolute terms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents challenge
Weight: 0.57
, correction
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, force
Weight: 0.56
Siblings great depression
Weight: 0.71
, slump
Weight: 0.42
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, cold war
Weight: 0.32
, pandemic
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be assessed in absolute terms 1.00
be assessed in terms 0.95
be measured 0.78
is measured 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(force, be measured)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(force, be measured)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(force, be measured)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(force, be measured)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(recession, be assessed in terms)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(recession, be assessed in terms)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(recession, be assessed in terms)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(recession, be assessed in terms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(force, be measured)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(recession, be assessed in absolute terms)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(force, be measured)