recognition: be of interest to employee

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents honor
Weight: 0.61
, achievement
Weight: 0.60
, function
Weight: 0.60
, accolade
Weight: 0.54
Siblings award
Weight: 0.67
, endorsement
Weight: 0.58
, acceptance
Weight: 0.33
, success
Weight: 0.32
, scholarship
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be of interest to employee 1.00
be of interest 0.82
be important for employees 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(recognition, be of interest to employee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(recognition, be of interest to employee)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(recognition, be of interest to employee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(recognition, be of interest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(recognition, be of interest to employee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(recognition, be of interest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(recognition, be of interest to employee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(recognition, be important for employees)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(recognition, be of interest to employee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(recognition, be of interest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(recognition, be of interest to employee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(recognition, be important for employees)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(recognition, be of interest to employee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(recognition, be of interest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(recognition, be of interest to employee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(recognition, be important for employees)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(recognition, be of interest to employee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(recognition, be important for employees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(recognition, be of interest to employee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(recognition, be of interest to employee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(recognition, be of interest to employee)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(recognition, be of interest to employee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(recognition, be of interest to employee)