recombination: be important to sexually reproducing organisms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, function
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, process
Weight: 0.51
, mechanism
Weight: 0.50
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, phagocytosis
Weight: 0.33
, cell signaling
Weight: 0.33
, diffusion
Weight: 0.33
, fluorescence
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to sexually reproducing organisms 1.00
be important to reproducing organisms 0.93
be important to living organisms 0.84
be important to organisms 0.83
be important in living organism 0.82
be important in organism 0.81
meet oxygen requirements of multicellular organisms like humans 0.80
be important to functioning of organisms 0.78
meet oxygen requirement for multicellular organisms like human 0.78
meet oxygen requirement for multicellular organisms 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, be important to living organisms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, be important in living organism)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, be important to organisms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, be important to functioning of organisms)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(diffusion, be important to living organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(diffusion, be important to living organisms)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(diffusion, be important to organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(diffusion, be important to organisms)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(diffusion, be important in living organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(diffusion, be important in living organism)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(diffusion, be important to functioning of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(diffusion, be important to functioning of organisms)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(recombination, be important to reproducing organisms)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(recombination, be important to reproducing organisms)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(recombination, be important to reproducing organisms)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(recombination, be important to organisms)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(recombination, be important to organisms)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(recombination, be important to organisms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important to reproducing organisms)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important to organisms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(diffusion, be important to functioning of organisms)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(diffusion, be important in living organism)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(diffusion, be important to living organisms)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important to sexually reproducing organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(diffusion, be important to organisms)