recovery: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, function
Weight: 0.60
, term
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.58
Siblings salvage
Weight: 0.46
, stabilization
Weight: 0.34
, business activity
Weight: 0.33
, growth
Weight: 0.33
, rescue
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is low bad 0.77
be considered good 0.77
improve performance 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(recovery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(growth, is low bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(recovery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(growth, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(recovery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(growth, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(growth, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(recovery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(growth, is low bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(growth, is low bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(recovery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(recovery, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(recovery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(recovery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(recovery, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(recovery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(recovery, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(recovery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(growth, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(recovery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(growth, is low bad)