recycling: is is useful process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, project
Weight: 0.60
Siblings landfill
Weight: 0.35
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is is useful process 1.00
be difficult process 0.88
be useful 0.87
CAN can difficult process 0.84
is beneficial 0.78
be beneficial 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(recycling, is is useful process)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be difficult process)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be useful)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(recycling, CAN can difficult process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(recycling, CAN can difficult process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(recycling, be difficult process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is beneficial)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be beneficial)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(recycling, CAN can difficult process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(recycling, be useful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(recycling, be useful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(recycling, be useful)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(recycling, be difficult process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(recycling, is beneficial)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(recycling, be beneficial)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(recycling, be beneficial)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(recycling, is beneficial)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(recycling, be beneficial)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(recycling, is beneficial)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(recycling, CAN can difficult process)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(recycling, be difficult process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is is useful process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(recycling, is is useful process)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(recycling, is is useful process)