recycling: reduce carbon footprint

Property	Similarity
reduce carbon footprint	1.00
reduce greenhouse gas emissions	0.83
reduces greenhouse gas emission	0.82
reduce air pollution	0.80
reduce land pollution	0.79
reduce need for landfill	0.77
reduce amount of energy used by industry	0.77

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(recycling, reduce air pollution)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(recycling, reduce land pollution)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(recycling, reduce amount of energy used by industry)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(recycling, reduce greenhouse gas emissions)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(recycling, reduce greenhouse gas emissions)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(recycling, reduce air pollution)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(recycling, reduces greenhouse gas emission)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(recycling, reduce land pollution)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(recycling, reduce amount of energy used by industry)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(recycling, reduces greenhouse gas emission)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(recycling, reduce need for landfill)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(recycling, reduce greenhouse gas emissions)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(recycling, reduces greenhouse gas emission)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(recycling, reduce land pollution)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(recycling, reduce air pollution)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(recycling, reduce land pollution)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(recycling, reduce amount of energy used by industry)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(recycling, reduce air pollution)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(recycling, reduce need for landfill)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(recycling, reduce amount of energy used by industry)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(recycling, reduces greenhouse gas emission)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(recycling, reduce need for landfill)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(recycling, reduce greenhouse gas emissions)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(recycling, reduce carbon footprint) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(recycling, reduce need for landfill)

Parents	program Weight: 0.65 , service Weight: 0.60 , thing Weight: 0.60 , project Weight: 0.60
Siblings	landfill Weight: 0.35 , trash Weight: 0.34 , garbage Weight: 0.33

recycling: reduce carbon footprint

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible