red blood cell: survive without mitochondria

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blood cell
Weight: 0.91
, white blood cell
Weight: 0.82
, human cell
Weight: 0.78
, cell membrane
Weight: 0.75
, stem cell
Weight: 0.71
Siblings sperm cell
Weight: 0.40
, muscle cell
Weight: 0.40
, fat cell
Weight: 0.40
, cancer cell
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
survive without mitochondria 1.00
has physical part mitochondria 0.92
lack mitochondria 0.92
survive without nucleus 0.81
reproduce without nucleus 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sperm cell, has physical part mitochondria)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(fat cell, has physical part mitochondria)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(muscle cell, has physical part mitochondria)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(muscle cell, has physical part mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(muscle cell, has physical part mitochondria)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(fat cell, has physical part mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(fat cell, has physical part mitochondria)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(sperm cell, has physical part mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sperm cell, has physical part mitochondria)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red blood cell, reproduce without nucleus)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(red blood cell, reproduce without nucleus)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, reproduce without nucleus)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(red blood cell, reproduce without nucleus)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(red blood cell, survive without nucleus)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red blood cell, survive without nucleus)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, survive without nucleus)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(red blood cell, survive without nucleus)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(muscle cell, has physical part mitochondria)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fat cell, has physical part mitochondria)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, survive without mitochondria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sperm cell, has physical part mitochondria)