red cabbage: be more expensive than white cabbage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.73
, vegetable
Weight: 0.66
, salad
Weight: 0.64
, variety
Weight: 0.63
, green
Weight: 0.59
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.39
, cabbage
Weight: 0.38
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.38
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than white cabbage 1.00
be more expensive than cabbage 0.98
be called red cabbage 0.90
be called cabbage 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be called red cabbage)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cabbage, be called red cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be called red cabbage)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be called red cabbage)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be called cabbage)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, be called red cabbage)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, be called cabbage)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be more expensive than cabbage)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(red cabbage, be called red cabbage)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(red cabbage, be called cabbage)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than cabbage)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, be more expensive than cabbage)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(red cabbage, be more expensive than cabbage)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be called cabbage)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be called red cabbage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be more expensive than white cabbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cabbage, be called red cabbage)