red fox: turn in winter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
turn in winter 1.00
stay cold 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fox, turn in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, turn in winter)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(red fox, turn in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fox, turn in winter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, turn in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fox, turn in winter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fox, turn in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, turn in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(red fox, turn in winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(red fox, turn in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(red fox, turn in winter)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, turn in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(red fox, stay cold)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(red fox, turn in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(red fox, stay cold)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, turn in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, stay cold)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(red fox, turn in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(red fox, stay cold)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(red fox, turn in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, turn in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, turn in winter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(red fox, turn in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, turn in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, turn in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fox, turn in winter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, turn in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fox, turn in winter)