red panda: be are threatened

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be are threatened 1.00
is threatened 0.93
be are protected 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(endangered species, is threatened)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red panda, be are threatened)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(red panda, be are threatened)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(endangered species, is threatened)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be are threatened)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, is threatened)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(endangered species, is threatened)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(red panda, be are threatened)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(red panda, be are threatened)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(red panda, be are threatened)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(red panda, be are threatened)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(red panda, be are threatened)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(red panda, is threatened)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(red panda, be are threatened)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is threatened)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(red panda, be are threatened)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(red panda, is threatened)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(red panda, be are threatened)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red panda, is threatened)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(red panda, be are threatened)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(red panda, be are protected)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(red panda, be are threatened)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red panda, be are threatened)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be are threatened)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(red panda, be are threatened)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red panda, be are threatened)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be are threatened)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(endangered species, is threatened)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(red panda, be are threatened)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(endangered species, is threatened)