red panda: be classified

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be classified 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be classified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be classified)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(red panda, be classified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(panda bear, be classified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be classified)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(red panda, be classified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(red panda, be classified)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(red panda, be classified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(red panda, be classified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be classified)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(red panda, be classified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(red panda, be classified)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be classified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(panda bear, be classified)