red panda: survive in winter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
survive in winter 1.00
survive in wild 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(monkey, survive in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(red panda, survive in winter)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(red panda, survive in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(monkey, survive in winter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(red panda, survive in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(monkey, survive in winter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(monkey, survive in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(red panda, survive in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(red panda, survive in winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(red panda, survive in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(red panda, survive in winter)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(red panda, survive in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(red panda, survive in wild)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(red panda, survive in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(red panda, survive in wild)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(red panda, survive in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(red panda, survive in wild)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(red panda, survive in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(red panda, survive in wild)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(red panda, survive in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(red panda, survive in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(red panda, survive in winter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(red panda, survive in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(red panda, survive in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(red panda, survive in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(monkey, survive in winter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(red panda, survive in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(monkey, survive in winter)