red wine: go with meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents white wine
Weight: 0.89
, wine
Weight: 0.79
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.68
Siblings burgundy
Weight: 0.60
, claret
Weight: 0.56
, grape juice
Weight: 0.37
, madeira
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
go with meat 1.00
go with red meat 0.95
be good with steak 0.81
be recommended with beef 0.79
be good with ribeye steak 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wine, be good with steak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(red wine, go with meat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(red wine, go with meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wine, be good with steak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(red wine, go with meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wine, be good with steak)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wine, be good with steak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(red wine, go with meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red wine, go with meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(red wine, go with meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(red wine, go with meat)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(red wine, go with meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(red wine, go with red meat)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(red wine, go with meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(red wine, go with red meat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(red wine, go with meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(red wine, go with red meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(red wine, go with meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red wine, go with red meat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(red wine, go with meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(red wine, be good with steak)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(red wine, go with meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(red wine, go with meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(red wine, go with meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(red wine, go with meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(red wine, go with meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(red wine, go with meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(wine, be good with steak)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(red wine, go with meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(wine, be good with steak)