red wine: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents white wine
Weight: 0.89
, wine
Weight: 0.79
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.68
Siblings burgundy
Weight: 0.60
, claret
Weight: 0.56
, grape juice
Weight: 0.37
, madeira
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(red wine, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(white wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(red wine, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(white wine, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(white wine, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(grape juice, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(madeira, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(red wine, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(white wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(red wine, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(madeira, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(madeira, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(grape juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(grape juice, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(red wine, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(red wine, is best)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(red wine, is best)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(red wine, is best)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(red wine, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red wine, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(red wine, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(white wine, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(madeira, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(grape juice, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(white wine, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(red wine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)