redneck: hate math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.51
, word
Weight: 0.50
, group
Weight: 0.49
, racist
Weight: 0.47
, poor people
Weight: 0.44
Siblings nigger
Weight: 0.32
, bigot
Weight: 0.32
, cowboy
Weight: 0.32
, moron
Weight: 0.31
, cunt
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
hate math 1.00
hate people 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(poor people, hate people)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(redneck, hate math)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(redneck, hate math)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(poor people, hate people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(redneck, hate math)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(poor people, hate people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(poor people, hate people)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(redneck, hate math)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(redneck, hate math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(redneck, hate math)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(redneck, hate math)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(redneck, hate math)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(redneck, hate people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(redneck, hate math)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(redneck, hate people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(redneck, hate math)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(redneck, hate people)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(redneck, hate math)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(redneck, hate people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(redneck, hate math)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(redneck, hate math)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(redneck, hate math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(redneck, hate math)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(redneck, hate math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(redneck, hate math)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(poor people, hate people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(redneck, hate math)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(poor people, hate people)