reduction: be in government spending

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.62 , cost Weight: 0.61 , change Weight: 0.60 , payment Weight: 0.59
Siblings	gain Weight: 0.56 , offset Weight: 0.56 , decrease Weight: 0.36 , decline Weight: 0.34 , drop Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be in government spending	1.00
be in consumer spending	0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(reduction, be in government spending) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(reduction, be in government spending)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(reduction, be in government spending) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(reduction, be in consumer spending)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(reduction, be in government spending) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(reduction, be in consumer spending)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(reduction, be in government spending) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(reduction, be in consumer spending)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(reduction, be in government spending) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(reduction, be in consumer spending)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(reduction, be in government spending) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(reduction, be in government spending) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(reduction, be in government spending)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(reduction, be in government spending) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(reduction, be in government spending)