redundancy: be problem in databases

Related concepts

Parents	issue Weight: 0.59 , feature Weight: 0.58 , factor Weight: 0.57 , thing Weight: 0.56
Siblings	continuity Weight: 0.31 , steve jobs Weight: 0.31 , replication Weight: 0.31 , integration Weight: 0.31 , automatic transmission Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be problem in databases	1.00
be bad in database	0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(redundancy, be problem in databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(redundancy, be problem in databases)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(redundancy, be problem in databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(redundancy, be bad in database)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.25

Salient(redundancy, be problem in databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(redundancy, be bad in database)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(redundancy, be problem in databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be bad in database)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(redundancy, be problem in databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(redundancy, be bad in database)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Salient(redundancy, be problem in databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(redundancy, be problem in databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be problem in databases)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(redundancy, be problem in databases) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(redundancy, be problem in databases)