redwood: is national park important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tree
Weight: 0.68
, conifer
Weight: 0.63
, wood
Weight: 0.56
, park
Weight: 0.51
, type
Weight: 0.48
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, maple tree
Weight: 0.37
, sycamore
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is national park important 1.00
is national park 0.98
is national park famous 0.94
is park important 0.92
is park 0.88
is park famous 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, is national park)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(redwood, is national park important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(park, is national park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(park, is national park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, is national park)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(redwood, is national park important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(redwood, is national park important)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(redwood, is national park)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(redwood, is national park)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(redwood, is national park famous)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(redwood, is national park)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(redwood, is park important)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(redwood, is national park famous)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(redwood, is park important)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(redwood, is national park famous)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(redwood, is park)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(redwood, is park important)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(redwood, is park)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(redwood, is park)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(redwood, is park famous)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(redwood, is park famous)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(redwood, is park famous)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(redwood, is national park)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(redwood, is national park famous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(redwood, is park important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(redwood, is park famous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(redwood, is park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(redwood, is national park important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(redwood, is national park important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is national park)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(redwood, is national park important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is national park)