referee: has color white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents official
Weight: 0.62
, coach
Weight: 0.57
, penalty
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings ref
Weight: 0.34
, umpire
Weight: 0.32
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.32
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color white 1.00
be called blue 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(soccer ball, has color white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(umpire, be called blue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ref, be called blue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(soccer ball, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(soccer ball, has color white)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(ref, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(ref, be called blue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(umpire, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(umpire, be called blue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(referee, has color white)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(referee, be called blue)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, be called blue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(referee, be called blue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(referee, be called blue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, has color white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(soccer ball, has color white)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(umpire, be called blue)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ref, be called blue)