referee: have letters on back

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents official
Weight: 0.62
, coach
Weight: 0.57
, penalty
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings ref
Weight: 0.34
, umpire
Weight: 0.32
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.32
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have letters on back 1.00
have letters 0.94
wear letters 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(referee, have letters on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(ref, have letters)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(referee, have letters on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(ref, have letters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(ref, have letters)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(referee, have letters on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(referee, have letters on back)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(referee, have letters on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(referee, wear letters)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(referee, have letters on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear letters)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(referee, have letters on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(referee, wear letters)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(referee, have letters on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(referee, wear letters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(referee, have letters on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(referee, have letters on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(referee, have letters on back)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(referee, have letters on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(referee, have letters on back)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(referee, have letters on back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(ref, have letters)