reflection: be in spoons down

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.65
, song
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, object
Weight: 0.59
Siblings indicator
Weight: 0.34
, consequence
Weight: 0.33
, dark matter
Weight: 0.33
, snapshot
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in spoons down 1.00
be in spoons 0.97
be in spoons upside down 0.94
be in down spoon 0.86
be in upside down spoon 0.82
be in spoon 0.82
is spoon 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(reflection, be in spoons down)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(reflection, be in spoons)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(reflection, be in spoons)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(reflection, be in spoons)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(reflection, be in down spoon)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(reflection, be in down spoon)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(reflection, be in down spoon)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(reflection, be in spoons upside down)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(reflection, be in spoons upside down)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(reflection, be in spoons upside down)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(reflection, be in spoon)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(reflection, be in spoon)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(reflection, is spoon)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(reflection, be in spoon)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(reflection, be in upside down spoon)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(reflection, be in upside down spoon)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(reflection, be in upside down spoon)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(reflection, is spoon)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(reflection, be in spoons)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(reflection, is spoon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(reflection, be in down spoon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(reflection, be in spoon)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(reflection, is spoon)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(reflection, be in spoons upside down)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(reflection, be in upside down spoon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(reflection, be in spoons down)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(reflection, be in spoons down)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(reflection, be in spoons down)