reflex: be useful to animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, process
Weight: 0.50
, publication
Weight: 0.46
, quality
Weight: 0.45
Siblings swallowing
Weight: 0.52
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.34
, immune response
Weight: 0.33
, simple function
Weight: 0.32
, digestion
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful to animals 1.00
be important for animals 0.91
be useful to humans 0.90
be necessary for animals 0.88
be useful 0.86
is useful 0.85
be necessary process for animals 0.83
be such as useful 0.81
be important for survival animals 0.81
be useful to body 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(reflex, be useful to animals)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(reflex, be useful to animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(factor, be useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(function, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(function, is useful)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(factor, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be necessary process for animals)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be necessary for animals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(trigonometric function, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(function, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(reflex, be useful to animals)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(reflex, be useful to animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(trigonometric function, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(trigonometric function, is useful)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(digestion, be necessary for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(digestion, be necessary for animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(digestion, be necessary process for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(digestion, be necessary process for animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(reflex, be useful to animals)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(reflex, is useful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(reflex, be useful to humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(reflex, be useful to humans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(reflex, be useful to humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(reflex, be such as useful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be useful to humans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be important for survival animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(reflex, be useful to body)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(reflex, be useful to body)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(reflex, be useful to body)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(reflex, is useful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(reflex, be such as useful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be useful to body)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(reflex, be important for survival animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(reflex, be such as useful)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(reflex, be important for survival animals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(reflex, be important for survival animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(reflex, is useful)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be such as useful)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(reflex, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(reflex, be useful to animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(factor, be useful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(function, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(trigonometric function, is useful)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(digestion, be necessary process for animals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(digestion, be necessary for animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(factor, be useful)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(reflex, be useful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(function, is useful)