reflex: is math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, process
Weight: 0.50
, publication
Weight: 0.46
, quality
Weight: 0.45
Siblings swallowing
Weight: 0.52
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.34
, immune response
Weight: 0.33
, simple function
Weight: 0.32
, digestion
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is math 1.00
be important in math 0.96
be related in math 0.94
be important in mathematics 0.89
be important in calculus 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(factor, be important in math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(reflex, is math)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(factor, be related in math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(reflex, is math)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(function, be important in mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(reflex, is math)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(function, be important in calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(reflex, is math)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(function, be important in mathematics)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(factor, be related in math)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in math)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(function, be important in calculus)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in math)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related in math)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in mathematics)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in calculus)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(factor, be important in math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(reflex, is math)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(factor, be related in math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(reflex, is math)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(function, be important in mathematics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(reflex, is math)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(function, be important in calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(reflex, is math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(reflex, is math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(reflex, is math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(reflex, is math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, be important in math)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(factor, be related in math)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(function, be important in mathematics)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(function, be important in calculus)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(factor, be related in math)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(function, be important in mathematics)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, be important in math)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(reflex, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(function, be important in calculus)