refraction: be important to function of fibers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, effect
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, concept
Weight: 0.49
, process
Weight: 0.48
Siblings viscosity
Weight: 0.33
, dispersion
Weight: 0.33
, hardness
Weight: 0.32
, aperture
Weight: 0.32
, polarity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to function of fibers 1.00
be important to function of optic fibers 0.94
be important to function 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(refraction, be important to function of fibers)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(refraction, be important to function of fibers)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(refraction, be important to function of fibers)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(refraction, be important to function of optic fibers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(refraction, be important to function of fibers)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(refraction, be important to function of optic fibers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(refraction, be important to function of fibers)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(refraction, be important to function of optic fibers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(refraction, be important to function of fibers)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(refraction, be important to function)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(refraction, be important to function of fibers)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(refraction, be important to function)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(refraction, be important to function of fibers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(refraction, be important to function of optic fibers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(refraction, be important to function of fibers)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(refraction, be important to function)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(refraction, be important to function of fibers)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(refraction, be important to function)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(refraction, be important to function of fibers)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(refraction, be important to function of fibers)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(refraction, be important to function of fibers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(refraction, be important to function of fibers)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(refraction, be important to function of fibers)