region: be in york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.69
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, financial institution
Weight: 0.59
, province
Weight: 0.59
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, east asia
Weight: 0.70
, north dakota
Weight: 0.67
, south
Weight: 0.65
, west
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in york 1.00
be in new york 0.98
be in york described 0.91
be in new york described 0.90
be in mexico 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(region, be in york)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(region, be in york described)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(region, be in york described)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(region, be in york described)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(region, be in york described)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(region, be in new york)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(region, be in new york)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(region, be in new york described)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(region, be in new york described)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(region, be in mexico)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(region, be in new york described)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(region, be in new york)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(region, be in new york)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(region, be in new york described)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(region, be in mexico)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(region, be in mexico)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(region, be in mexico)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(region, be in york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(region, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(region, be in york)