regulation: be on practice nonexistent

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents measure
Weight: 0.64
, protection
Weight: 0.63
, limit
Weight: 0.62
, prohibition
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mandate
Weight: 0.65
, period
Weight: 0.59
, interpretation
Weight: 0.59
, regulator
Weight: 0.57
, legislation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on practice nonexistent 1.00
be on practice 0.84
is practice 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be on practice nonexistent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, is practice)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(regulation, be on practice nonexistent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(interpretation, is practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(interpretation, is practice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(regulation, be on practice nonexistent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(regulation, be on practice nonexistent)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(regulation, be on practice nonexistent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(regulation, be on practice)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(regulation, be on practice nonexistent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(regulation, be on practice)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(regulation, be on practice nonexistent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(regulation, be on practice)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(regulation, be on practice nonexistent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be on practice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(regulation, be on practice nonexistent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(regulation, be on practice nonexistent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be on practice nonexistent)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(regulation, be on practice nonexistent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(regulation, be on practice nonexistent)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be on practice nonexistent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(interpretation, is practice)