reimbursement: be tied to patient satisfaction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amount
Weight: 0.61
, service
Weight: 0.61
, fee
Weight: 0.59
, claim
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.58
Siblings health insurance
Weight: 0.33
, escort service
Weight: 0.33
, hospital care
Weight: 0.32
, postal service
Weight: 0.32
, tuition
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be tied to patient satisfaction 1.00
drop patient 0.80
be critical to patient 0.79
drop patient with cancer 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(amount, be critical to patient)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(amount, be critical to patient)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(amount, be critical to patient)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, drop patient)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, drop patient with cancer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(amount, be critical to patient)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(health insurance, drop patient with cancer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(health insurance, drop patient with cancer)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(health insurance, drop patient)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(health insurance, drop patient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(amount, be critical to patient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(health insurance, drop patient)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(health insurance, drop patient with cancer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(reimbursement, be tied to patient satisfaction)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(amount, be critical to patient)