relation: be important to organisation

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.57 , account Weight: 0.57 , condition Weight: 0.55 , third party Weight: 0.53
Siblings	friendship Weight: 0.61 , identity Weight: 0.60 , servant Weight: 0.59 , attribute Weight: 0.57 , term Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important to organisation	1.00
be important in servicescapes	0.98
be important in work	0.90
be important to well	0.88
be important to people	0.88
be important at work	0.87
be important to us	0.87
be important in life	0.85
be important to life	0.85
is very important	0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(relation, be important to organisation)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(account, be important to us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(relation, be important to organisation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(account, be important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(condition, be important in servicescapes)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(account, be important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(friendship, be important at work)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(attribute, be important to life)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(identity, be important in work)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(identity, be important to well)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(friendship, be important in life)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(friendship, be important to us)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(friendship, be important to people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(relation, be important to organisation)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(account, be important to us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(relation, be important to organisation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(friendship, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(friendship, be important to people)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(friendship, be important to us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(friendship, be important to us)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(friendship, be important at work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(friendship, be important at work)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(identity, be important to well) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(identity, be important to well)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(identity, be important in work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(identity, be important in work)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(friendship, be important in life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(friendship, be important in life)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(attribute, be important to life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(attribute, be important to life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(relation, be important to organisation)

Similarity expansion

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(relation, is very important)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(relation, is very important)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(relation, is very important)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(relation, is very important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(relation, be important to organisation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(account, be important to us)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(friendship, be important to us)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(friendship, be important to people)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(friendship, be important at work)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(friendship, be important in life)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(identity, be important to well)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(identity, be important in work)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(attribute, be important to life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(account, be important to us)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(relation, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)