relation: was strained in 1790

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, account
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.55
, third party
Weight: 0.53
Siblings friendship
Weight: 0.61
, identity
Weight: 0.60
, servant
Weight: 0.59
, attribute
Weight: 0.57
, term
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
was strained in 1790 1.00
were strained 0.99
was strained with england 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(relation, was strained in 1790) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(relation, was strained in 1790)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(relation, was strained in 1790) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(relation, were strained)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(relation, was strained in 1790) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(relation, were strained)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(relation, was strained in 1790) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(relation, were strained)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(relation, was strained in 1790) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(relation, was strained with england)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(relation, was strained in 1790) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(relation, was strained with england)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(relation, was strained in 1790) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(relation, was strained with england)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(relation, was strained in 1790) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(relation, were strained)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(relation, was strained in 1790) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(relation, was strained with england)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(relation, was strained in 1790) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(relation, was strained in 1790) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(relation, was strained in 1790)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(relation, was strained in 1790) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(relation, was strained in 1790)