relative: annoy on facebook

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents victim
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.57
, source
Weight: 0.56
, time
Weight: 0.56
Siblings sibling
Weight: 0.60
, neighbor
Weight: 0.32
, elderly person
Weight: 0.32
, mother
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
annoy on facebook 1.00
is annoying 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(relative, annoy on facebook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(neighbor, is annoying)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(relative, annoy on facebook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(sibling, is annoying)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(relative, annoy on facebook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(neighbor, is annoying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(neighbor, is annoying)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(relative, annoy on facebook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(sibling, is annoying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sibling, is annoying)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(relative, annoy on facebook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(relative, annoy on facebook)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(relative, annoy on facebook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(relative, is annoying)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(relative, annoy on facebook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(relative, is annoying)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(relative, annoy on facebook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(relative, is annoying)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(relative, annoy on facebook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(relative, is annoying)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(relative, annoy on facebook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(relative, annoy on facebook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(relative, annoy on facebook)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(relative, annoy on facebook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(relative, annoy on facebook)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(relative, annoy on facebook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(neighbor, is annoying)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(relative, annoy on facebook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sibling, is annoying)