relativity: be by mc escher

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents theory
Weight: 0.72
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.59
, revolution
Weight: 0.56
, subject
Weight: 0.55
Siblings quantum physics
Weight: 0.36
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.34
, string theory
Weight: 0.34
, constructivism
Weight: 0.34
, quantum mechanics
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be by mc escher 1.00
is jeffrey bennett 0.77
be in usa 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(revolution, be in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(relativity, be by mc escher)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(relativity, be by mc escher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(revolution, be in usa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(relativity, be by mc escher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(revolution, be in usa)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(revolution, be in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(relativity, be by mc escher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(relativity, be by mc escher)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(relativity, be by mc escher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(relativity, be by mc escher)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(relativity, be by mc escher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(relativity, is jeffrey bennett)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(relativity, be by mc escher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(relativity, is jeffrey bennett)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(relativity, be by mc escher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(relativity, is jeffrey bennett)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(relativity, be by mc escher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(relativity, is jeffrey bennett)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(relativity, be by mc escher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(relativity, be by mc escher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(relativity, be by mc escher)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(relativity, be by mc escher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(relativity, be by mc escher)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(relativity, be by mc escher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(revolution, be in usa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(relativity, be by mc escher) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(revolution, be in usa)